OCCRP A2 FINANCIAL CRIME LOW RISK Published 15 Sep 2026 at 13:34 UTC, affecting RS

OCCRP: Probe Into Serbian Ruling Party’s Election Call Center Yields No Progress After Three Years

OCCRP reports Serbian police have not questioned anyone in three years investigating alleged vote-buying and illicit campaign finance by the ruling SNS party.

Read the original notice ↗ All RS items

In short

  • The Ministry of Interior transferred the case between departments and has yet to submit a report to prosecutors.
  • The CINS exposé documented conditional employment and undeclared cash payments linked to the SNS call center.

What happened

Serbian police have failed to interview any suspects in nearly three years of investigating alleged vote-buying and illicit campaign finance involving the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), according to OCCRP. The case has been repeatedly transferred between police departments, with prosecutors sending reminders but receiving no response.

The investigation originated from a November 2023 CINS exposé documenting conditional employment and undeclared cash payments at an SNS call center. Despite official denials from SNS, M&J Lady, and CEROB, the case was cited in the OSCE ODIHR election report as an example of voter pressure and illicit third-party campaign financing.

FROM THE NOTICE
Based on the conduct so far, one could conclude that the police and the prosecution are accomplices in covering up a crime,
Vladimir Tupanjac, CINS, occrp.org

What compliance teams should check

  • Review the OSCE ODIHR final election report for references to the CINS investigation and voter pressure typologies.
  • Monitor the Ministry of Interior's promised report to the First Basic Public Prosecutor’s Office regarding the SNS call center case.
  • Assess compliance risks related to undeclared cash payments and conditional employment practices documented by CINS at the Center for Education and Youth Development of Belgrade (CEROB).

Why it matters

This story highlights persistent gaps in Serbia’s enforcement of campaign finance and anti-corruption laws, with police and prosecutors failing to act on well-documented allegations. For AML/CFT compliance officers, it underscores the importance of monitoring political exposure, third-party financing, and undeclared cash flows, especially during election cycles. The lack of investigative progress and official denials despite credible evidence may signal systemic weaknesses and potential risks for financial institutions dealing with politically exposed persons or entities linked to the case.

FOR COMPLIANCE TEAMS

Catch stories like these on your own customers.

complead screens your customers against adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, and re-checks them every day. When a name you hold turns up in the news, it lands in your case queue with the evidence attached.

Related on the radar

All RS items →

How the radar works

Each item is classified by category, pinned to the jurisdictions it affects and scored from 0 to 10. The score starts from a model assessment of how serious the item is, then adds points for the kind of event, what it names and the source behind it. Reliability grades run from A1 (the regulator’s own notice) to C3 (a single secondary source).

AML News Radar reports what its sources publish. Summaries, categories and scores are automated; read the original notice before acting. It is not legal advice and not a screening decision.

Read the full methodology

Subscribe to the radar

You will get new items from every jurisdiction and category.

DIGEST