audit packs
Put together after the request, from what people recall.
Regulatory requirements are turned into workflows; the workflows then generate the evidence; reports, filings, decisions, and approvals are recorded as the work is carried out and become available when a supervisor requests them.
The reporting is the visible aspect, while the case management, covering all the modules, is accessed by both internal and external auditors via the same record.
A supervisor rarely asks whether the control works now. They ask how it worked in March: what data it used, who decided, and why. Most teams can show today and rebuild the past from memory.
Put together after the request, from what people recall.
A threshold without a change log can be stated, not defended.
The report is in one system, the reasoning in another and the data in a third.
Alerts, dispositions, reason codes and approvals are recorded as soon as they occur.
Every threshold change is dated, assigned a cause, and made reversible, along with the measured impact.
The case provides draft versions of the SAR and STR, and jurisdiction rules apply per entity.
Each pack is provided either per entity or per period, including the list of decisions and the approvers.
The retention rules allow no exceptions. A record that has been archived but is unreadable satisfies none of them.
Read the compliance guidesA quarterly evidence-assembly exercise became an export. The review turned into a reading exercise, and the parameter history answered questions that used to require a meeting.
No. Drafts are prepared from the case trail, and the approval and submission stay with your team. A named person reviews and signs every report before it is sent, which keeps accountability where the regulations place it.
From the record. List versions, parameter history and decision logs are dated and retrievable per period. A supervisor asking how a control worked in March gets the data it used, who decided and why, rather than an account rebuilt from memory.
Each change is dated, given a cause and made reversible, with its measured impact recorded. A threshold with a change log can be defended in an examination; one without it can only be stated.
Alerts, dispositions, reason codes and approvals, as they happen and with a named owner. The record is written while the work is done, so nothing has to be reconstructed when a request arrives.
Formats and deadlines are handled per entity, while the suspicion process stays single. Each FIU receives the format and timeline it requires, and group compliance still sees one consistent process across entities.
No assembly time, because it is exported rather than built, per entity or per period. The pack includes the list of decisions and their approvers, generated from the record, so nothing in it depends on recall.
To your retention policy: five years in most regimes and ten where required. The record stays readable for the full period, because an archived file that cannot be opened satisfies none of the retention rules.
Reports are drafted from the case record, and the case record is shared across every module. Reporting is the visible part; the casework underneath is what makes each report traceable to its evidence.
Yes. Internal and external auditors work from the same case record across every module. They see the evidence your team saw, not an extract prepared for them.
Filings, the risk assessment and its review history, decision records per period, and model and parameter governance. Each runs on its own clock: FIU reports from detection, the risk assessment at least annually, and decision records for five to ten years.
We will show you where the answer lives, and what the export looks like.