Seconds
to first stake
Onboarding friction is a commercial decision the regulator does not accept as one.
By industry
AML and player protection together
Licence conditions bind affordability, self-exclusion and money laundering to the same player record. Screening them separately is how licences get reviewed.
What you switch on
What an operator switches on first
Player identity and list exposure at signup; behaviour immediately after.
Why this matters here
The regulator asks about one player, not one control.
Source of funds, affordability, self-exclusion and sanctions are separate obligations that describe the same person. A licence review reads them as one story, and gaps between systems are where it finds the plot holes.
Four registers
four systems
Self-exclusion, affordability, sanctions and PEP each live somewhere else.
Source of funds
asked too late
Requested after the deposits that made it necessary.
Seconds
From signup to first stake
3
Registers checked at signup
15 min
Rescreening interval
−63%
Manual player reviews
Journey · Two sides
Scroll to advance
A customer through your funnel
-
Step 01
Signup, in seconds
Identity, sanctions, PEP and self-exclusion checked before the first stake is accepted.
-
Step 02
Deposit behaviour watched
Velocity and affordability signals score on the same player record as the list exposure.
-
Step 03
Source of funds, on trigger
Requested at a threshold you set, with evidence attached to the player file.
-
Step 04
The licence file
One player, one history, exportable for the condition the regulator is asking about.
complead / player / signup
- Signups today9,240
- Registers checked3
- Median152 ms
complead / player / behaviour
- Flagged for affordability84
- Deposit velocity alerts12
- Combined score1 record
complead / player / sof
- SoF requests31
- Documents received27
- Accounts restricted4
complead / cases / player
- Interventions logged128
- Self-exclusions honoured100%
- Exportper condition
Signup
Behaviour
Funds
Licence
What you answer to
Licence conditions, not just AML law
In gambling the operating licence carries obligations beyond the money laundering regime, and both are reviewed by the same body.
Read the compliance guides
Gambling regulator
Player protection and AML conditions
Continuous
Regulator
Self-exclusion register compliance
Per signup
FIU
Suspicious activity reporting
On detection
Auditor
Intervention history per player
On review
Case study · iGaming
Read the case study
An operator put four checks on one player record
Sanctions, self-exclusion, affordability and source of funds each had a system and none had a shared view. Consolidating onto one record turned a licence review from an archaeology exercise into an export.
4 → 1
Systems per player
−63%
Manual reviews
100%
Exclusions honoured
Cross-family links
Where teams like yours go next
FAQ
Before you ask us
Can this run before the first stake?
Yes. Identity, list and register checks return in around 150 ms, inside the signup flow.
Do you cover self-exclusion registers?
National registers are checked at signup and on re-entry, with the result recorded on the player file.
How is affordability handled?
Deposit velocity and behaviour signals score on the same record as list exposure, so one review covers both.
What does a licence review receive?
One player history covering every condition, exported for the period the regulator names.
See one player, four obligations, one record
Bring a player journey you had to reconstruct manually. We will show you it as a single file.
3,000+
Data sources checked
220+
Countries covered
15 min
Always real-time data