Compliance for your industry all on a single platform.

Start from the page for the license you hold, the workflow you are fixing or the desk you work at. Each page is written for that reader, but all sixteen lead to the same platform and the same customer record.

No. Screening, monitoring, cases and reporting run on the same risk engine whichever page you came through. The page changes the starting point and the configuration, not the product underneath.

Usually AML screening and ongoing monitoring, because every license requires both from day one. The first alerts then show where the gap is: payments teams often add fraud signals next, wealth managers add ownership and risk scoring. The next module is chosen on evidence, not on a roadmap.

Yes. A new module reads from the customer record that already exists, so it extends the setup rather than creating a second one. Nothing is re-integrated, no data is migrated and past decisions stay on the same file.

The integration is the same for every sector. What changes is the configuration: the threshold set for each segment, the data types in scope, such as wallets, policies or credit facilities, and the reports your supervisor expects.

With one CSV, one API call or a live sync from your core system. Before anything is screened, entity resolution merges the same person or company arriving from different systems into one record. Each customer is screened once and raises one alert, not one per source system.

They stay in scope for as long as the relationship lasts. Rescreening runs every fifteen minutes, and only a real change, such as a new designation, a PEP tier change or an adverse story, raises an alert. Risk scores and transaction monitoring update on the same record as new data arrives, not on a timetable.

Every action is logged with its owner and time, and the evidence behind it stays with the case. Reports are drafted from that same file, so what you file matches what your team actually saw and decided.

How you know a control worked on a given date, and where that is written down. Duties differ by license, from a risk assessment reviewed at least annually to reports filed on detection, but that question stays the same. The platform is built so the answer is an export, not a reconstruction.

Bring a sample file to the demo. In thirty minutes you see how your customers match, the scores they receive and the audit export they produce. You judge the platform on your own names and edge cases, not on prepared test data.