Introducing Complead. One AI-native platform for financial crime compliance. Read the story
New Ready Integrations available Check the new integrations
By industry

Diligence for wealth and asset management

Source of wealth, layered ownership and long relationships — the diligence that takes weeks, evidenced in a form that survives review.

Why this matters here

Your highest-value client is also your highest-risk file.

Foreign PEPs, family offices and multi-layer structures all demand enhanced diligence — and all resent friction. The work is unavoidable; assembling the evidence for it twice is not.

Source of wealth

gathered, then lost

Collected in an onboarding email and never attached to the record.

Structures

resolved by hand

Trusts and holdcos traced in a spreadsheet nobody versions.

Periodic review

a quarterly fire drill

The same files re-read because the last review left no trail.

4 tiers PEP scope including RCA
10 yr Retention where required
100% Structures resolved to persons
−48% Periodic review effort
Journey · Layer by layer

A customer through your funnel

Scroll to advance
  1. Step 01 The client and the structure

    Trust, holdco and fund layers resolved to the natural persons behind them.

  2. Step 02 Enhanced diligence, evidenced

    Foreign PEP status, source of wealth and adverse media attached to the record rather than an inbox.

  3. Step 03 The relationship continues

    Rescreening every fifteen minutes and a review cycle that starts from the last decision, not from zero.

  4. Step 04 Ten years later, still retrievable

    The file answers what was known, when, and who accepted it.

complead / kyb / structure
  • Layers traced6
  • Natural persons4
  • Registry sources3
complead / edd
  • PEP tierForeign, tier 2
  • SoW documents7
  • Adverse media1 categorised
complead / monitoring
  • Clients in scope4,880
  • Due for review112
  • Pre-populated112
complead / audit / client
  • Decisions retained1,904
  • Retention10 years
  • Exportper client
Structure
EDD
Monitor
Retain
What you answer to

What enhanced diligence has to produce

Every regime asks for more scrutiny on these clients. Few define it, so the burden of showing what you did falls entirely on your record.

Read the compliance guides
Supervisor Documented EDD for foreign PEPs Per relationship
Regulator Source of wealth enquiry and evidence Before onboarding
Auditor Periodic review with decision history Per cycle
Jurisdiction Retention up to ten years Post-relationship
Case study · Wealth

A private bank halved its periodic review effort

Reviews restarted from scratch because the previous decision left nothing behind. Once the trail carried forward, the cycle became a check on what changed rather than a re-reading of the file.

−48% Review effort
6 layers Deepest structure traced
10 yr Retention met
Read the case study
FAQ

Before you ask us

How deep do you trace ownership?

To the natural persons, across registry sources, with each hop recorded and dated.

Where does source of wealth live?

On the client record with its supporting documents, not in an onboarding mailbox.

Can reviews carry forward?

Yes. A periodic review opens pre-populated with the last decision and highlights only what changed.

Do you support ten-year retention?

Yes, configurable by jurisdiction, and retrievable per client for the full period.

Bring your most complicated structure

We will resolve it to natural persons in the demo, and show you what the file looks like a year later.

3,000+ Data sources checked
220+ Countries covered
15 min Always real-time data