gathered, then lost
Collected in an onboarding email and never attached to the record.
Source of wealth, layered ownership and long relationships — the diligence that takes weeks, evidenced in a form that survives review.
Ownership and diligence first; the review cycle follows from them.
Foreign PEPs, family offices and multi-layer structures all demand enhanced diligence — and all resent friction. The work is unavoidable; assembling the evidence for it twice is not.
Collected in an onboarding email and never attached to the record.
Trusts and holdcos traced in a spreadsheet nobody versions.
The same files re-read because the last review left no trail.
Trust, holdco and fund layers resolved to the natural persons behind them.
Foreign PEP status, source of wealth and adverse media attached to the record rather than an inbox.
Rescreening every fifteen minutes and a review cycle that starts from the last decision, not from zero.
The file answers what was known, when, and who accepted it.
Every regime asks for more scrutiny on these clients. Few define it, so the burden of showing what you did falls entirely on your record.
Read the compliance guidesReviews restarted from scratch because the previous decision left nothing behind. Once the trail carried forward, the cycle became a check on what changed rather than a re-reading of the file.
To the natural persons, across registry sources, with each hop recorded and dated.
On the client record with its supporting documents, not in an onboarding mailbox.
Yes. A periodic review opens pre-populated with the last decision and highlights only what changed.
Yes, configurable by jurisdiction, and retrievable per client for the full period.
We will resolve it to natural persons in the demo, and show you what the file looks like a year later.