one set of facts, typed again
The case gives the full picture and the document contains a condensed version.
Once your team has confirmed suspicious activity, you don't need to start a report from scratch; the agent prepares it from the case trail, you add any relevant details, someone signs it off, and the evidence pack goes with it.
Owner, findings, timeline, decision: the case recorded it all while your team worked. Copying it into a form costs hours, drops detail, and eats into the deadline. The agent writes the draft from what is already on the record, so your analyst sharpens a few points instead of rewriting the story.
The case gives the full picture and the document contains a condensed version.
Most regimes start their count as soon as they notice suspicion, and each hour spent retyping is deducted from that period.
The narrative goes out without the documents that back it.
The alert was turned into a case, the relevant notes and evidence were gathered, and its owner then treated it as suspicious.
Based on the evidence from the case: what was seen, the order in which it was seen, and the team's conclusion.
The MLRO adds details when needed, makes edits, and approves the report, which is then included in the record.
Together with the filing, all evidence, the list form, and the timestamp for each step are provided for the regulator.
The rule determines which confirmed cases are included in a draft filing, and no report is submitted without a signature.
Drag a trigger, a condition and an action onto the canvas. No scripting, no deploy.
Go by the confidence score, the match status, the risk level, the entity type, the amount, the channel, the number of articles, and the like.
Equals, greater than, between, in, is true, and more. You can add conditions just as you would say them.
Close, set status, set risk, assign, tag, note, notify, convert to case, send a webhook, switch monitoring on or off.
Several outcomes on one canvas. Clear matches close, uncertain ones route, the rare hard ones escalate.
Apply the rule to the live alerts within the simulation, and you'll see all the decisions it would have reached before any case moved.
A report with no trail raises the possibility of further examination. Every run records what the agent read, what it drafted, and what it altered, under the user logged in to your account. The examiner looks at the actual path, not at a reconstructed version.
No. The agent prepares the report from the case trail. A named person on your team reviews and approves it, and your team submits it to the FIU. The approval is written into the record, so no report leaves without a signature.
From the case trail: what was seen, the order it was seen in and the team's conclusion. The owner, findings, timeline and decision were recorded while the case was worked, so the draft uses facts already on file instead of a retyped summary.
Most regimes start it from the point of detection, which is when your team confirms suspicion on the case. The draft is ready as soon as that decision is made, so retyping does not eat into the deadline.
The MLRO adds details where needed, edits the draft and approves it. The agent provides the starting narrative; the conclusion and the signature remain a person's responsibility.
Yes. Gaps in the draft are flagged for the MLRO to complete before approval. A missing detail is marked where it belongs, so it is resolved before the report goes out rather than raised later by the FIU.
The evidence, the list version and a timestamp for each step, packed with the report. The narrative never goes out without the documents behind it, and each statement can be followed back to its source.
Your rule sets which confirmed cases are included, using fields such as risk level, confidence score and entity type. Low-risk cases can close, borderline ones go to review, and confirmed suspicion goes to the MLRO for filing.
Yes. A rule can assign the case to the MLRO, add the draft narrative as a note, send a notification and tag it as awaiting signature. The case reaches the signer with everything attached, not through a shared inbox.
Yes. Every run records what the agent read, what it drafted and what it changed, and whether the step was applied, simulated, skipped or failed. The examiner sees the path the report actually took.
The deadline runs from detection, and retyping costs hours that come out of it. Copying the case into a form also drops detail the case already holds, so the filed report ends up thinner than the investigation behind it.
We will show you the same report assembled from a case trail, with the evidence already attached.