Reconstructed
audit packs
Assembled after the request says what someone remembers, not what happened.
By role
For the person who signs
Personal liability attaches to your name. This is the platform that makes the control evidenceable rather than merely present.
What you switch on
What the person who signs needs switched on
Governance is not a module. It is what the other four leave behind.
Why this matters here
You will be asked what was true on a date in the past.
Not whether the system works today — whether it worked in March, what data it held, who decided, and on what basis. Most programmes can demonstrate the first and reconstruct the rest badly.
Unreviewed
overrides
Legitimate until nobody looks at the pattern of them.
Undated
parameters
A threshold with no history cannot be defended, only asserted.
4
Artefacts an auditor asks for
100%
Decisions with a named owner
5–10 yr
Retention by jurisdiction
1 click
Evidence pack export
Week · Over time
Scroll to advance
A week in the job
-
Step 01
Monday: the queue you inherited
Alerts arrive ranked, grouped by customer, with the reason on the row. Nothing waits for triage.
-
Step 02
Wednesday: the decision that needs you
Escalations arrive with the ownership chain already resolved and the source text attached.
-
Step 03
Thursday: the filing
SAR and STR drafted from the case trail, with jurisdiction differences handled per entity.
-
Step 04
Quarter end: the evidence
Every artefact an auditor asks for, exported per period rather than assembled by hand.
complead / alerts
- Open34
- Breaching SLA0
- Unassigned2
complead / cases / #212
- Escalated3
- Awaiting MLRO1
- Signing pausedyes
complead / reports
- Drafts2
- Filed this month9
- Deadline10 days from detection
complead / audit
- Decisions retained18,204
- Parameter changes logged46
- Exportper case or period
Queue
Escalate
File
Evidence
What you answer to
What lands on your name
In several regimes the accountability is personal, not corporate. The evidence has to be retrievable by you, not by a vendor.
Read the compliance guides
Supervisor
Named officer with documented authority
On appointment
FIU
Filing within the statutory window
From detection
Board
Programme effectiveness reporting
Annual
Auditor
Retrievable decision record per period
5–10 years
Case study · Payments
Read the case study
An MLRO who stopped preparing for reviews
The team replaced a quarterly evidence-assembly exercise with an export. The review itself became a reading exercise, and the parameter history answered the questions that used to require a meeting.
0
Days spent assembling packs
46
Parameter changes logged
100%
Decisions with an owner
Cross-family links
Where teams like yours go next
FAQ
Before you ask us
Does this replace my judgement?
No. It records it — including overrides, which are legitimate as long as the pattern is reviewed.
Can I prove a control was working on a past date?
Yes. List versions, parameter history and decision logs are all dated and retrievable per period.
What if we operate in several jurisdictions?
Filing formats and deadlines are handled per entity; the underlying suspicion standard stays one process.
How long does the record last?
To your retention policy — five years in most regimes, ten where the jurisdiction requires it.
Bring the question your last auditor asked
We will show you where the answer lives, and what the export looks like.
3,000+
Data sources checked
220+
Countries covered
15 min
Always real-time data