Introducing Complead. One AI-native platform for financial crime compliance. Read the story
New Ready Integrations available Check the new integrations
By industry

AML for insurers and intermediaries

Risk lives in the policy lifecycle, not the transaction stream — at underwriting, at beneficiary change, and at surrender.

Why this matters here

The money launders at surrender, not at signature.

A life policy taken out cleanly can be assigned, have its beneficiary changed, and be surrendered early — three events most programmes never screen. Meanwhile the broker who sold it was checked once, years ago.

Beneficiaries

screened never

The named party changes and nobody re-runs the check.

Brokers

checked once at appointment

An intermediary network is a counterparty base nobody monitors.

Early surrender

the classic red flag

Detectable in the policy system, invisible to the AML tool.

3 Lifecycle trigger points
100% Beneficiaries in scope
15 min Rescreening interval
−61% Broker onboarding time
Journey · Over time

A customer through your funnel

Scroll to advance
  1. Step 01 Underwriting

    Policyholder, payer and proposed beneficiary all screened, not just the applicant.

  2. Step 02 The broker network

    Intermediaries resolved and monitored as counterparties in their own right.

  3. Step 03 Lifecycle events

    Assignment, beneficiary change and premium source changes each re-trigger the check.

  4. Step 04 Surrender and payout

    The payout decision carries the full history of who was checked, and when.

complead / policy / underwriting
  • Policies today1,240
  • Parties screened3,102
  • Median148 ms
complead / intermediaries
  • Brokers in scope2,884
  • PEP-linked31
  • Reviewed this month2,884
complead / policy / events
  • Beneficiary changes96
  • Rescreened96
  • Alerts raised3
complead / cases / payout
  • Payouts held2
  • Reasonearly surrender + PEP
  • Evidence packready
Underwrite
Brokers
Events
Payout
What you answer to

Where insurance obligations differ

Life and investment products are in scope in every major regime; general insurance often is not. The distinction has to be in your risk assessment, not in your habits.

Read the compliance guides
National supervisor Risk assessment covering product lines Annual
EU AMLD Beneficiary identification before payout Per policy
FIU Reporting on suspicion On detection
Internal audit Intermediary oversight evidence Per cycle
Case study · Insurance

A life insurer put beneficiaries in scope for the first time

Screening ran at underwriting and nowhere else. Adding beneficiary and assignment events cost one integration and surfaced three cases in the first quarter that the old model could not have seen.

3 New trigger points
−61% Broker onboarding time
2 weeks To live
Read the case study
FAQ

Before you ask us

Is general insurance in scope?

Usually not, but the exclusion belongs in your documented risk assessment rather than in practice alone.

Can we screen brokers as counterparties?

Yes. Intermediaries are resolved and monitored exactly like customers, including PEP and adverse media.

What triggers a rescreen?

Beneficiary change, assignment, premium source change and surrender — configurable per product line.

Does this touch our policy admin system?

Only as an event feed. Nothing about the policy record has to move.

Screen a policy the way it actually behaves

Bring one life product with its lifecycle events. We will show you where the current checks stop.

3,000+ Data sources checked
220+ Countries covered
15 min Always real-time data