screened once
The named party changes and nothing on the shared file flags it, because there isn't a shared file to flag it on
Each policyholder, broker, and beneficiary that you examine is entered into the same file; the risk score established during the underwriting process is the one against which a claim is later checked, not a new estimate based on nothing.
Start by screening all individuals based on the policy and then continue to monitor their risk as it changes.
A life insurance policy may seem simple at first but can be given to a different person, have its beneficiary changed, or be surrendered early. Each of these changes should update the same file used to check the final claim. But in most systems, this doesn't happen: underwriting lives in one system, the broker is checked only once in another, and the event that should trigger a new review happens in a third system that no one in the other two can access.
The named party changes and nothing on the shared file flags it, because there isn't a shared file to flag it on
An intermediary is handled as if it were a one-off form, rather than as an entity with its own file which should be updated when their own risk changes.
The policy system records the surrender, but the AML record never sees it.
The policyholder, the payer, and the proposed beneficiary were all brought together in a single file, not just the applicant and not into three separate files.
Brokers and intermediaries also get their own file, and it's resolved and monitored the same way a customer's is, rather than being included in the applicant's record or ignored after the appointment.
The assignment, the change of beneficiary, and the change in who pays the premium all directly affect that one file; none of these actions creates a side note that someone has to reconcile.
The payout decision reads the entire file, including underwriting, the broker's checks, and all events up to that point, rather than creating a new check based only on the information in front of it.
Life insurance and investment-linked products are in scope in all major AML regimes; general insurance usually is not. The difference should be reflected in your risk assessment, not your habits.
Read the compliance guidesScreening ran at underwriting and nowhere else. Adding beneficiary and assignment events cost one integration and surfaced three cases in the first quarter that the old model could not have seen.
Life insurance and investment-linked products, in every major regime, along with the brokers and intermediaries who distribute them. General insurance usually falls outside, and that exclusion belongs in your documented risk assessment so a supervisor can see it was decided, not assumed.
The policyholder, the payer and the beneficiary, brought together in one file at underwriting. In life insurance these are often three different people, and the risk usually sits with the one who is not the applicant, such as a third-party premium payer or a beneficiary named later.
Yes. The payer is a party on the same file from underwriting, and a change in who pays the premium triggers a rescreen. A third-party payer with no clear link to the policyholder is one of the classic red flags in life insurance, so it is checked, not assumed.
Yes. Brokers and intermediaries get their own file and are monitored like customers, including PEP and adverse media. An intermediary's risk can change after appointment, and a broker who brings in unusual business is often the first sign of a pattern across several policies.
Beneficiary change, assignment, a change in who pays the premium, and surrender, each configurable per product line. These are the points where control of the money shifts, so each one updates the same file the final payout is checked against. The underwriting score is never the last word.
The payout decision reads the whole file: underwriting, broker checks and every lifecycle event up to that point. A claim is checked against the risk score set when the policy was written, not against a new estimate based only on the payout request.
Yes. A payout can be held pending review, and the hold is recorded with a documented reason and an owner. The same record shows when the hold was released and on what evidence, which is what an examiner reads when they ask why a payment was delayed or allowed.
Only as an event feed. Assignments, beneficiary changes and surrenders arrive as events, and nothing about the policy record has to move or be rebuilt. Your policy administration system stays the system of record for the contract, and complead holds the AML file.
Laundering through life insurance usually happens on the way out: a large single premium paid in, then an early surrender or a cancellation in the cooling-off period that returns clean funds. The money shows up at surrender, not at the sale, so the check has to read the full policy history, including who paid in and who is now being paid.
Beneficiaries must be identified as soon as they are named or designated, and verified before payout, per policy. Where a beneficiary is described by class, such as "my children", identification follows once they can be determined. Keeping every beneficiary in scope on the same file is how that requirement is met.
Bring one life product with its lifecycle events. We will show you where the current checks stop.