U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE A1 FINANCIAL CRIME HIGH RISK Published 16 Oct 2026 at 12:00 UTC, affecting US

DOJ: Former New Orleans Personal Injury Attorney Sentenced in Connection with Staged Accident Probe

DOJ sentenced Danny Patrick Keating, Jr. to thirty-two months imprisonment for conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud in staged accident cases.

Read the original notice ↗ All US items

In short

  • Keating admitted paying for thirty-one illegally staged tractor-trailer accidents and settled seventeen of them, keeping approximately $358,000.00 in attorney’s fees.
  • Sixty-three defendants have been charged in the federal probe into staged collisions in New Orleans.

What happened

Danny Patrick Keating, Jr., a New Orleans personal injury attorney, was sentenced to thirty-two months imprisonment, three years supervised release, and ordered to pay $657,405.34 in restitution for his role in a conspiracy involving staged automobile accidents with tractor-trailers. He was indicted in 2020 and pleaded guilty in 2021 to knowingly paying for thirty-one staged accidents.

Keating represented seventy-seven plaintiffs in these staged accidents, settled seventeen cases, and received approximately $1,500,000.00 in settlement monies, keeping $358,000.00 as attorney’s fees. The lawsuits he filed fraudulently misrepresented accident details and involved false testimony, with sixty-three defendants charged in the ongoing federal probe.

FROM THE NOTICE
KEATING admitted filing lawsuits in state and federal court in Louisiana, on behalf of his clients who were involved in the staged accidents. The lawsuits he filed on behalf of the seventy-seven (77) plaintiffs fraudulently misrepresented the identity of the driver of these vehicles, fraudulently misrepresented who was at fault in the staged accidents, and fraudulently claimed injuries.
DOJ, justice.gov

In numbers

  • thirty-two (32) months imprisonment sentence for Keating
  • $657,405.34 restitution ordered
  • sixty-three (63) defendants charged in federal probe

Named in this item

2 entities
STATUS NAME ISO PROGRAM IDENTIFIER
Danny Patrick Keating, Jr.
Person, convicted
Screen this name
US — —
U.S. Department of Justice
Organization, prosecutor
Screen this name
US — —

What compliance teams should check

  • Review client lists and settlement records for links to the thirty-one staged tractor-trailer accidents involving Damian Labeaud.
  • Screen for fraudulent misrepresentation in lawsuits filed on behalf of seventy-seven plaintiffs in New Orleans staged accident cases.
  • Monitor for connections to the sixty-three defendants charged in the federal probe into staged collisions.

Why it matters

This case highlights the risks of fraud schemes involving staged accidents and fraudulent legal claims, which can result in significant financial losses and legal exposure for financial institutions and insurers. Compliance officers must be vigilant in identifying suspicious settlement patterns, misrepresented accident details, and connections to known fraud probes. The ongoing federal investigation and the creation of the National Fraud Enforcement Division signal increased scrutiny and enforcement, making robust AML/CFT controls essential to detect and report such activities.

FOR COMPLIANCE TEAMS

Catch stories like these on your own customers.

complead screens your customers against adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, and re-checks them every day. When a name you hold turns up in the news, it lands in your case queue with the evidence attached.

Related on the radar

All US items →

How the radar works

Each item is classified by category, pinned to the jurisdictions it affects and scored from 0 to 10. The score starts from a model assessment of how serious the item is, then adds points for the kind of event, what it names and the source behind it. Reliability grades run from A1 (the regulator’s own notice) to C3 (a single secondary source).

AML News Radar reports what its sources publish. Summaries, categories and scores are automated; read the original notice before acting. It is not legal advice and not a screening decision.

Read the full methodology

Subscribe to the radar

You will get new items from every jurisdiction and category.

DIGEST