SERIOUS FRAUD OFFICE A1 LEGAL & REGULATORY LOW RISK Published 13 Oct 2026 at 09:10 UTC, affecting GB

SFO: Guidance: Make a corporate self-report

SFO outlines how corporates can self-report serious fraud, bribery and corruption directly to its Intelligence Division.

Read the original notice ↗ All GB items

In short

  • Self-reports must be submitted by email and only corporate self-referrals will be assessed.
  • Legal representatives can discuss potential self-referrals with the Director of Legal Services via a dedicated email address.

What happened

The SFO has published guidance for corporates on how to self-report cases of serious fraud, bribery, and corruption. Reports must be sent directly to the SFO's Intelligence Division by email, and only corporate self-referrals will be considered for assessment.

Legal representatives of corporates can now discuss potential self-referrals with the Director of Legal Services using a specific email address. The SFO also provides Corporate Cooperation Guidance for organisations seeking a non-prosecution outcome.

FROM THE NOTICE
A corporate self-report should be made directly to our Intelligence Division via email to intelunit@sfo.gov.uk.
SFO Guidance: Make a corporate self-report, gov.uk

Named in this item

1 entity
STATUS NAME ISO PROGRAM IDENTIFIER
Serious Fraud Office
Organization, regulator
GB — —

What compliance teams should check

  • Ensure all corporate self-reports of serious fraud, bribery or corruption are submitted to intelunit@sfo.gov.uk as specified by the SFO.
  • Advise legal representatives to use GeneralCounsel@sfo.gov.uk for discussing potential self-referrals with the Director of Legal Services.
  • Review the SFO's Corporate Cooperation Guidance to understand requirements for securing a non-prosecution outcome.

Why it matters

This guidance clarifies the official process for corporates to self-report serious fraud, bribery, and corruption to the SFO, which is crucial for compliance officers managing internal investigations and disclosures. Following the correct reporting channels and understanding the SFO's expectations can influence the outcome of enforcement actions, including the possibility of securing a non-prosecution agreement. Compliance teams must ensure they use the specified contacts and review the Corporate Cooperation Guidance to align their procedures with regulatory expectations.

FOR COMPLIANCE TEAMS

Catch stories like these on your own customers.

complead screens your customers against adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, and re-checks them every day. When a name you hold turns up in the news, it lands in your case queue with the evidence attached.

Related on the radar

All GB items →

How the radar works

Each item is classified by category, pinned to the jurisdictions it affects and scored from 0 to 10. The score starts from a model assessment of how serious the item is, then adds points for the kind of event, what it names and the source behind it. Reliability grades run from A1 (the regulator’s own notice) to C3 (a single secondary source).

AML News Radar reports what its sources publish. Summaries, categories and scores are automated; read the original notice before acting. It is not legal advice and not a screening decision.

Read the full methodology

Subscribe to the radar

You will get new items from every jurisdiction and category.

DIGEST