THE GUARDIAN A2 FINANCIAL CRIME HIGH RISK Published 29 Sep 2026 at 16:05 UTC, affecting GB

Guardian: Manchester City found guilty on all Premier League charges over rule breaches

The Guardian reports Manchester City were found guilty of all Premier League financial rule breaches over a nine-year period, with more than £900m in artificially inflated revenues.

Read the original notice ↗ All GB items

In short

  • The Guardian states City operated a disguised funding scheme worth £830.6m from 2009-10 to 2017-18 and hid costs by a further £70m.
  • The Guardian notes City will appeal the verdict before Friday’s deadline and the Premier League published a redacted 40-page core decision.

What happened

Manchester City were found guilty by an independent commission of breaching Premier League financial rules over nine seasons, including arranging sham contracts and filing inaccurate accounts to hide their finances. The club artificially inflated revenues and reduced costs by more than £900m, with disguised funding schemes involving sponsors and image rights deals.

The commission also found City guilty of failing to cooperate with the Premier League and acting in bad faith, making concerted efforts to frustrate the investigation. The Premier League published a redacted 40-page core decision after a 42-day hearing, and City will appeal the verdict before Friday’s deadline.

In numbers

  • £900m artificially inflated revenues and reduced costs
  • £830.6m disguised funding scheme over nine seasons
  • 40 pages in the redacted core decision

Named in this item

2 entities
STATUS NAME ISO PROGRAM IDENTIFIER
Manchester City
Organization, accused
Screen this name
GB — —
Premier League
Organization, regulator
GB — —

What compliance teams should check

  • Review all sponsorship and commercial contracts for sham arrangements as described in the Premier League core decision.
  • Assess image rights deals with players and managers for compliance with Premier League and Uefa spending limits.
  • Ensure cooperation and good faith with Premier League investigations, referencing the commission’s findings on Manchester City’s conduct.

Why it matters

This case highlights the risks of complex funding schemes and sham contracts used to circumvent financial rules, which can lead to severe regulatory consequences including points deductions and potential relegation. The commission’s findings on false witness testimony and deliberate obstruction underscore the importance of transparency and cooperation with regulators. Compliance officers must scrutinize all financial arrangements and ensure accurate reporting to avoid similar breaches and regulatory action, especially given the scale of the misconduct and the unprecedented punishment likely to follow.

FOR COMPLIANCE TEAMS

Catch stories like these on your own customers.

complead screens your customers against adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, and re-checks them every day. When a name you hold turns up in the news, it lands in your case queue with the evidence attached.

FROM THE NOTICE ‘Sham’ contracts helped inflate revenues by £900m Commission finds club guilty over nine-season period Manchester City breached Premier League financial rules by creating “sham” contracts to help inflate revenue and reduce costs by more than £900m over a nine-year period, an independent commission found. The league announced on Tuesday that City had been found guilty on all charges related to serious breaches of its financial rules between seasons 2009-10 and 2017-18. It said a sanction would be addressed in a further hearing with the commission. Continue reading... The Guardian, 29 Sep 2026, 16:05 UTC, theguardian.com

Related on the radar

All GB items →

How the radar works

Each item is classified by category, pinned to the jurisdictions it affects and scored from 0 to 10. The score starts from a model assessment of how serious the item is, then adds points for the kind of event, what it names and the source behind it. Reliability grades run from A1 (the regulator’s own notice) to C3 (a single secondary source).

AML News Radar reports what its sources publish. Summaries, categories and scores are automated; read the original notice before acting. It is not legal advice and not a screening decision.

Read the full methodology

Subscribe to the radar

You will get new items from every jurisdiction and category.

DIGEST