U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE A1 FINANCIAL CRIME HIGH RISK Published 15 Oct 2026 at 12:00 UTC, affecting US

DOJ: Owner of Health Care Software Company Sentenced to 19 Years in Prison for $1B Medicare Fraud

DOJ reports a Kansas CEO was sentenced to 19 years for defrauding Medicare and other federal health care programs out of more than $1 billion.

Read the original notice ↗ All US items

In short

  • The scheme involved generating false doctors’ orders and prescriptions for orthotic braces and other items using the DMERx platform.
  • Medicare was fraudulently billed for orthotic braces for more than 346,000 beneficiaries, with Medicare and other insurers paying over $450 million.

What happened

A Kansas CEO, owner of HealthSplash and DMERx, was sentenced to 19 years in prison for orchestrating a telemedicine fraud scheme that generated false doctors’ orders and prescriptions, defrauding Medicare and other federal health care benefit programs out of more than $1 billion. The scheme aggressively targeted hundreds of thousands of Medicare beneficiaries, billing Medicare for medically unnecessary orthotic braces and other items.

The fraudulent operation connected pharmacies, DME suppliers, and marketers with telemedicine companies that accepted illegal kickbacks for signed doctors’ orders. Medicare was billed for four braces per beneficiary, with at least 21 orthotics prescribed through DMERx to over 1,200 beneficiaries. The scheme was concealed through sham contracts and manipulation of doctors’ orders to avoid Medicare audits.

FROM THE NOTICE
The defendant’s fraud scheme lured hundreds of thousands of elderly and disabled Americans into a sophisticated international telemarketing system with one goal: stealing as much as possible from the Medicare trust fund.
Assistant Attorney General Colin M. McDonald, DOJ, justice.gov

In numbers

  • 19 years prison sentence for Kansas CEO
  • $1 billion amount defrauded from Medicare and other programs
  • 346,000 Medicare beneficiaries fraudulently billed for orthotic braces

What compliance teams should check

  • Review claims involving DMERx and HealthSplash for false doctors’ orders and prescriptions.
  • Audit orthotic brace billing for patterns of four braces per beneficiary and at least 21 orthotics prescribed to over 1,200 beneficiaries.
  • Scrutinize contracts and doctors’ orders for evidence of manipulation or removal of telemedicine references to avoid Medicare audits.

Why it matters

This case highlights the vulnerability of federal health care programs to large-scale telemedicine fraud schemes, where false prescriptions and kickbacks can result in massive financial losses and undermine program integrity. Compliance officers must be vigilant in detecting patterns of fraudulent billing, especially involving internet-based platforms and telemedicine providers. The DOJ’s focus on prosecuting such schemes and the involvement of multiple agencies underscore the importance of robust internal controls, thorough audits, and cross-agency cooperation to prevent and detect health care fraud.

FOR COMPLIANCE TEAMS

Catch stories like these on your own customers.

complead screens your customers against adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, and re-checks them every day. When a name you hold turns up in the news, it lands in your case queue with the evidence attached.

Related on the radar

All US items →
16 Oct 2026
FINANCIAL TIMES A2 TERRORISM & SANCTIONS
EU vows to maintain Russia sanctions after US pivot
MED
16 Oct 2026
ABC NEWS (AUSTRALIA) A2 FINANCIAL CRIME
Bonza owner pleads guilty to $500 million fraud
HIGH
16 Oct 2026 MED
15 Oct 2026 MED

How the radar works

Each item is classified by category, pinned to the jurisdictions it affects and scored from 0 to 10. The score starts from a model assessment of how serious the item is, then adds points for the kind of event, what it names and the source behind it. Reliability grades run from A1 (the regulator’s own notice) to C3 (a single secondary source).

AML News Radar reports what its sources publish. Summaries, categories and scores are automated; read the original notice before acting. It is not legal advice and not a screening decision.

Read the full methodology

Subscribe to the radar

You will get new items from every jurisdiction and category.

DIGEST