U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE A1 FINANCIAL CRIME HIGH RISK Published 14 Oct 2026 at 12:00 UTC, affecting US

DOJ: Man Posing as San Francisco 49er Indicted in Wire Fraud Scheme

DOJ reports that Daejon Labrayae Delenar Love was indicted for conspiracy to commit wire fraud involving fraudulent high-yield investment opportunities.

Read the original notice ↗ All US items

In short

  • Love allegedly posed as a wealthy investor or NFL player, using online dating and social media to solicit victims and misappropriate funds for personal expenses.
  • If convicted, Love faces up to 20 years in federal prison, three years of supervised release, and a $250,000 fine.

What happened

A federal grand jury in Portland indicted Daejon Labrayae Delenar Love for conspiracy to commit wire fraud after he and a co-conspirator allegedly solicited victims to invest in fake high-yield opportunities, using fabricated identities and staged displays of wealth to gain trust. Love was arraigned, pleaded not guilty, and was ordered detained pending a jury trial set for December 15, 2026.

The indictment alleges that Love used online dating and social media profiles with false information to develop romantic relationships with victims, persuading them to send cash or wire funds, which he then used for personal expenses such as travel, lodging, vehicles, clothing, and jewelry. The FBI is investigating, and the case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorneys Bryan Chinwuba and Christopher Cardani.

FROM THE NOTICE
Love allegedly presented himself as a wealthy real estate investor or a current or former NFL player.
DOJ, justice.gov

In numbers

  • 20 years maximum federal prison sentence
  • $250,000 maximum fine if convicted

Named in this item

2 entities
STATUS NAME ISO PROGRAM IDENTIFIER
Daejon Labrayae Delenar Love
Person, accused
Screen this name
US — —
San Francisco 49ers
Organization, victim
US — —

What compliance teams should check

  • Review customer profiles for use of fabricated personal and financial information similar to those described in the indictment against Daejon Labrayae Delenar Love.
  • Monitor for investment solicitations promising unusually large and rapid returns, such as the 'expedited account' referenced in the DOJ indictment.
  • Flag transactions involving high-end vehicles, jewelry, or luxury expenses linked to accounts with recent wire transfers, as outlined in the DOJ case.

Why it matters

This case highlights the importance of robust customer due diligence and transaction monitoring to detect and prevent fraud schemes that exploit fabricated identities and false investment opportunities. Compliance officers must be vigilant for red flags such as promises of unusually high returns, use of social media or dating platforms for financial solicitations, and the rapid movement of funds into personal luxury expenditures. The DOJ's focus on prosecuting such schemes underscores the need for financial institutions to strengthen controls and reporting mechanisms to mitigate wire fraud and related financial crimes.

FOR COMPLIANCE TEAMS

Catch stories like these on your own customers.

complead screens your customers against adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, and re-checks them every day. When a name you hold turns up in the news, it lands in your case queue with the evidence attached.

Related on the radar

All US items →
16 Oct 2026
FINANCIAL TIMES A2 TERRORISM & SANCTIONS
EU vows to maintain Russia sanctions after US pivot
MED
16 Oct 2026
ABC NEWS (AUSTRALIA) A2 FINANCIAL CRIME
Bonza owner pleads guilty to $500 million fraud
HIGH
16 Oct 2026 MED
15 Oct 2026 MED

How the radar works

Each item is classified by category, pinned to the jurisdictions it affects and scored from 0 to 10. The score starts from a model assessment of how serious the item is, then adds points for the kind of event, what it names and the source behind it. Reliability grades run from A1 (the regulator’s own notice) to C3 (a single secondary source).

AML News Radar reports what its sources publish. Summaries, categories and scores are automated; read the original notice before acting. It is not legal advice and not a screening decision.

Read the full methodology

Subscribe to the radar

You will get new items from every jurisdiction and category.

DIGEST