U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE A1 FINANCIAL CRIME HIGH RISK Published 5 Oct 2026 at 12:00 UTC, affecting US

DOJ: Four Charged in Multistate Bank Fraud and Money-Laundering Scheme

DOJ reports four individuals have been charged in an eight-count federal indictment for a multistate bank-fraud and money-laundering scheme involving stolen and altered checks.

Read the original notice ↗ All US items

In short

  • The defendants allegedly deposited altered checks into accounts they controlled, withdrawing and laundering more than $45,000 and $34,000 in separate instances.
  • Charges include bank fraud, conspiracy to commit money laundering, aggravated identity theft, and the indictment seeks forfeiture of the proceeds.

What happened

Four individuals from multiple states were charged in an eight-count federal indictment for their roles in a scheme involving stolen and altered checks from a multinational corporation. The indictment alleges they replaced payee names with their own or with identity-theft victims, then deposited and laundered the funds through various transactions.

The indictment details that Hill laundered more than $45,000 and Duncan laundered more than $34,000, while Sims and Daniels deposited multiple altered checks and conducted ATM withdrawals and electronic transactions. The charges include bank fraud, money laundering, conspiracy, and aggravated identity theft, with forfeiture of proceeds sought.

FROM THE NOTICE
The indictment alleges that the defendants altered those checks by removing the names of the intended payees and replacing them with their own names or with the name of an identity‑theft victim.
DOJ, justice.gov

In numbers

  • $45,000 fraud proceeds laundered by Hill
  • $34,000 fraud proceeds laundered by Duncan
  • 30 years maximum penalty for bank fraud

Named in this item

5 entities
STATUS NAME ISO PROGRAM IDENTIFIER
Cory L. Sims, Jr.
Person, accused
Screen this name
US — —
Dondre O. Daniels
Person, accused
Screen this name
US — —
Christian M. Hill
Person, accused
Screen this name
US — —
Makhia L. Duncan
Person, accused
Screen this name
US — —
multinational corporation
Organization, victim
— — —

What compliance teams should check

  • Review recent check deposits for alterations involving payee name changes, especially those linked to identity-theft victims as described in the DOJ indictment.
  • Monitor for ATM withdrawals and electronic transactions from accounts opened in the names of Sims, Daniels, Hill, or Duncan, or identity-theft victims.
  • Screen for transactions involving large withdrawals or transfers following deposits of checks issued by multinational corporations, as outlined in the indictment.

Why it matters

This case highlights the risks of check fraud and money laundering schemes that exploit weaknesses in payment and identity verification processes. Compliance officers must be vigilant for altered checks, especially those involving identity-theft victims, and monitor for suspicious patterns such as rapid withdrawals or transfers after deposits. The indictment underscores the importance of robust controls and timely detection to prevent financial institutions from being used to facilitate fraud and laundering activities, and to comply with regulatory expectations for reporting and investigation.

FOR COMPLIANCE TEAMS

Catch stories like these on your own customers.

complead screens your customers against adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, and re-checks them every day. When a name you hold turns up in the news, it lands in your case queue with the evidence attached.

Related on the radar

All US items →
16 Oct 2026
FINANCIAL TIMES A2 TERRORISM & SANCTIONS
EU vows to maintain Russia sanctions after US pivot
MED
16 Oct 2026
ABC NEWS (AUSTRALIA) A2 FINANCIAL CRIME
Bonza owner pleads guilty to $500 million fraud
HIGH

How the radar works

Each item is classified by category, pinned to the jurisdictions it affects and scored from 0 to 10. The score starts from a model assessment of how serious the item is, then adds points for the kind of event, what it names and the source behind it. Reliability grades run from A1 (the regulator’s own notice) to C3 (a single secondary source).

AML News Radar reports what its sources publish. Summaries, categories and scores are automated; read the original notice before acting. It is not legal advice and not a screening decision.

Read the full methodology

Subscribe to the radar

You will get new items from every jurisdiction and category.

DIGEST