In short
- All defendants are lawful permanent residents and face up to one year in prison and a $100,000 fine.
- The charges allege the individuals knowingly voted despite not being U.S. citizens.
What happened
On October 13 and 14, 2026, five non-citizens—Vikki Bradt, Samantha Merkle, Suad Sasic, Jacques Patry, and Paula Stitt—were charged with voting by aliens in federal elections across the Northern District of New York. All are lawful permanent residents and are accused of knowingly voting in elections for federal offices.
The charges carry a maximum sentence of one year in prison and a fine up to $100,000. The DOJ emphasized that only U.S. citizens can vote in federal elections and that these actions undermine public confidence in the electoral process.
the law is clear that only U.S. citizens can vote in elections that have candidates running for federal office. When non-citizens vote, the public loses confidence in the integrity of the election process and its outcome.
In numbers
- $100,000 maximum fine
Named in this item
Person, regulator US — —
Person, regulator US — —
Organization, regulator US — —
What compliance teams should check
- Review voter registration controls for lawful permanent residents in the Northern District of New York.
- Assess internal procedures for detecting and reporting violations under the statute(s) cited in the DOJ complaints.
- Update staff training on the legal distinction between U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents regarding federal election eligibility.
Why it matters
This case highlights the importance of robust controls to prevent non-citizens from participating in federal elections, a key area of regulatory and reputational risk for financial institutions and other entities involved in election-related processes. Compliance officers must ensure that their organizations have effective mechanisms to detect and report potential violations, as enforcement actions like these demonstrate heightened scrutiny and coordination among federal agencies. Failure to comply can result in significant penalties and undermine public trust in institutional integrity.
Catch stories like these on your own customers.
complead screens your customers against adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, and re-checks them every day. When a name you hold turns up in the news, it lands in your case queue with the evidence attached.