U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE A1 FINANCIAL CRIME HIGH RISK Published 7 Oct 2026 at 12:00 UTC, affecting US, PR

DOJ: Board Chairman and Co-Owner of Puerto Rican Bank Sentenced in Multimillion-Dollar Wire Fraud Conspiracy

U.S. Department of Justice sentenced the former board chairman of Nodus Bank to 62 months in prison and ordered forfeiture of approximately $13.6 million.

Read the original notice ↗ All US items

In short

  • U.S. Department of Justice reported that Ramirez caused Nodus Bank to lose at least $23,613,371 between 2017 and 2023.
  • U.S. Department of Justice stated that Ramirez fraudulently induced the purchase of at least 47 promissory notes totaling approximately $25.3 million.

What happened

The U.S. Department of Justice announced that Juan Francisco Ramirez, former board chairman and co-owner of Nodus International Bank, was sentenced to 62 months in prison, three years of supervised release, and ordered to pay forfeiture of approximately $13.6 million. Ramirez led a wire fraud conspiracy that resulted in significant losses for the bank and its depositors.

From 2017 to 2023, Ramirez and a co-conspirator illegally siphoned funds from Nodus Bank, including investing more than $11 million in a Miami-based lender and purchasing at least 47 promissory notes totaling approximately $25.3 million. These actions contributed to the bank's collapse and caused losses of at least $23,613,371.

In numbers

  • 62 months in prison sentenced
  • $13.6 million forfeiture ordered
  • $23,613,371 losses caused to Nodus Bank

What compliance teams should check

  • Review insider transaction policies and enforcement at Nodus International Bank for compliance with Puerto Rican law and OCIF regulations.
  • Audit all investments and promissory note purchases involving Miami-based finance companies linked to Nodus Bank between 2018 and 2021.
  • Verify voluntary liquidation procedures and OCIF notifications for Nodus Bank, especially regarding the $26 million loan portfolio purchase in April 2023.

Why it matters

This case highlights the risks posed by insider fraud and the importance of robust controls over bank transactions, especially those involving senior management. The fraudulent activities at Nodus Bank led to multimillion-dollar losses and the bank's collapse, demonstrating how weak oversight and concealment of prohibited transactions can undermine financial institutions. Compliance officers must ensure strict adherence to insider transaction policies, thorough audits of related-party dealings, and vigilant monitoring of liquidation processes to prevent similar failures and protect depositor funds.

FOR COMPLIANCE TEAMS

Catch stories like these on your own customers.

complead screens your customers against adverse media, sanctions and PEP lists, and re-checks them every day. When a name you hold turns up in the news, it lands in your case queue with the evidence attached.

FROM THE NOTICE The former board chairman and co-owner of Nodus International Bank (Nodus Bank), a Puerto Rican International Banking Entity, was sentenced today to 62 months in prison, three years of supervised release, and to pay forfeiture of approximately $13.6 million, which represents the value of the proceeds he derived from the wire fraud conspiracy. U.S. Department of Justice, 7 Oct 2026, 12:00 UTC, justice.gov

Related on the radar

All US items →
16 Oct 2026
FINANCIAL TIMES A2 TERRORISM & SANCTIONS
EU vows to maintain Russia sanctions after US pivot
MED
16 Oct 2026
ABC NEWS (AUSTRALIA) A2 FINANCIAL CRIME
Bonza owner pleads guilty to $500 million fraud
HIGH
16 Oct 2026 MED

How the radar works

Each item is classified by category, pinned to the jurisdictions it affects and scored from 0 to 10. The score starts from a model assessment of how serious the item is, then adds points for the kind of event, what it names and the source behind it. Reliability grades run from A1 (the regulator’s own notice) to C3 (a single secondary source).

AML News Radar reports what its sources publish. Summaries, categories and scores are automated; read the original notice before acting. It is not legal advice and not a screening decision.

Read the full methodology

Subscribe to the radar

You will get new items from every jurisdiction and category.

DIGEST